Skip to content
HR City
  • Home
  • News & Articles
  • Our City of Services
    • Employee Relations
    • Training Solutions
    • Payroll Solutions
    • Catering
    • Venue Hire
  • About
  • Contact Us
Court News

Precautionary Suspension – Procedural Requirements

  • 21 February 201921 February 2019
  • by Eben van Deventer
eben
eben@hrcity.co.za

In the recent Constitutional Court Judgement between Allan Long and SAB (CCT 61/18), the highest court in the land held that where an employee is suspended as a precautionary measure in order to prevent interference with a pending investigation, there is no requirement that the employee be given an opportunity to make representations to the employer.

The Constitutional Court held that:

Where the suspension is precautionary and not punitive, there is no requirement to afford the employee an opportunity to make representations.

Allan Long v South African Breweries (PTY) LTD CCT61/18 (ConCourt) at Para [24]

As well as that:

In determining whether the precautionary suspension was permissible, the Labour Court reasoned that the fairness of the suspension is determined by assessing first, whether there is a fair reason for suspension and secondly, whether it prejudices the employee. The finding that the suspension was for a fair reason, namely for an investigation to take place, cannot be faulted. Generally where the suspension is on full pay, cognisable prejudice will be ameliorated. The Labour Court’s finding that the suspension was precautionary and did not materially prejudice the applicant, even if there was no opportunity for pre-suspension representations, is sound.


Allan Long v South African Breweries (PTY) LTD CCT61/18 (ConCourt) at Para [25]

This means that the previous Judgements which related to the fairness of suspension and required that the employee be afforded an opportunity to make submissions as to why he/she should not be suspended no longer apply to precautionary suspensions.

A precautionary suspension is, in terms of this judgement, such suspensions wherein an employee is suspended on full pay for the purposes of finalizing an investigation or, in some cases, to prevent an opportunity for an employee to cause further damage to the employer.

Where you are uncertain as to whether or not a proposed suspension would be protected, it is recommended that you seek professional advice before implementing such a suspension.

The Full Judgement is available for download Here.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Contract Cleaning Sector Minimum Wages – 2019
MEIBC Wage Increases – 2019/20
Constitutional Court disciplinary procedure Discipline Judgement Misconduct procedure Suspension

Related articles

Exempt
Increase to the BCEA Earnings…
Minimum-Wage
Increase to National Minimum Wage…
LocdkownZA
National Lockdown – What Now?…
LocdkownZA
National Lockdown – What Now?…
LocdkownZA
National Lockdown – What Now?…
LocdkownZA
National Lockdown – What Now?…
Exempt
Increase to the BCEA Earnings…
Minimum-Wage
Increase to National Minimum Wage…
LocdkownZA
National Lockdown – What Now?…
Minimum-Wage
Fast Food, Restaurant, Catering and…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Strike Season 2022 stands to be one of the most difficult to date
  • Increase to the BCEA Earnings Threshold – 2022
  • Increase to National Minimum Wage – March 2022
  • National Lockdown – What Now? – 18th Update – Updated 28 January 2022
  • National Lockdown – What Now? – 17th Update

Recent Comments

  • Eben van Deventer on Increase to National Minimum Wage – March 2021
  • Juanita on Increase to National Minimum Wage – March 2021
  • Eben van Deventer on MEIBC Wage Increases – 2019/20
  • Eben van Deventer on MEIBC Wage Increases – 2019/20
  • Mrs. F. Kayser on MEIBC Wage Increases – 2019/20

Archives

  • June 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • June 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • June 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • July 2012

Categories

  • Article
  • News

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Contact Details

46 Walter Sisulu Road, Middelburg, 1050
+27 82 576 9430
lizette@hrcity.co.za
Mon-Thurs: 08h00 - 17h00
Fri: 08h00 - 16h00

After Hours contact via cellphone to existing clients.

Facebook

Facebook
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Tag Cloud

Act (21) amendments (7) and (3) basic (3) basic conditions of employment act (5) bcea (5) conditions (3) contract cleaning (4) Coronavirus (19) COVID (19) Covid-19 UIF (17) Department (3) determination (11) directive (3) Disaster (18) DMA (18) domestic (4) domestic worker (4) employment (18) Essential Services (19) Judgement (3) Labour (10) labour law (6) Labour Law Amendments (4) labour relations act (5) Law (5) Lay-Off (19) legislation (7) Lockdown (19) Management (19) minimum (13) minimum wage (14) of (4) Permit (19) regulation (11) regulations (19) requirements (10) sector (4) sectoral (9) sectoral determination (7) TERS (17) UIF-TERS (17) uif benefits (17) wage (16) wages (7)
Copyright 2025 HR City - All Rights Reserved
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
%d